Rework the Developer(s) and Publisher(s) section in the Infobox?[]
As is, the information in those fields is, understandably, incomplete (and VERY slightly inaccurate in the Developer(s) section). However, while I do have all of that information for all versions, I feel that it would be impractical and hard to read to list all developers and publishers for all versions in the Infobox, especially since some developers/publishers were involved with multiple versions. Perhaps we should make a much easier to read table with that information if we really want to include it? Maybe the Infobox should list just DMA and Psygnosis, then refer to the table or something? It might be useful for the Platform(s) section as well; since my edit to that section there are now 31 versions listed there which is a bit unwieldy already. I'm a bit of a Wiki noob so forgive me if I worded this clumsily. The Tomato Watcher (talk)
- I don't know about anyone else, but easy-to-read is always recommended. OneWeirdDude (talk) 02:21, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- Alright, for now I have just created a table in a separate page with all the developer and publisher information and linked to it in the relevant sections in the Infobox. The Tomato Watcher (talk) 06:01, 14 January 2023 (UTC)